Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,242
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 345:
Line 345: + + + + +
→Path to Power (Continued): comment
I'll think about it. But I try to stay focussed, and not get into to much at once. Thanks. [[User:Order|Order]] 23:39, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
I'll think about it. But I try to stay focussed, and not get into to much at once. Thanks. [[User:Order|Order]] 23:39, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
:You will see on the [[Talk:Munich conference]], for example, we just review other material from the War Crimes Tribunal regarding Nazi infiltration and subversion of the Czech and Slovak regime; here for example, [http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/imt/tgmwc/tgmwc-02/], we evidence of "Campaign within Czechoslovakia since 1934"; Helen Scott was a member of an organization that was found to be controlled by a foreign government actively seeking to violent overthrow of the United States Government long before WWII borke out, she was a member that same organization when she took employment with the United States, which was illegal. And she was the agent of a foreign power when she worked on the staff of the American Porsecutotors at Nurermberg.
:So, today we have information available that was not avialable for nearly 50 years. My point is, much of what we know about all of these events needs to be re analysized. But first we must assemble the facts before we can doi a review. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 00:56, 30 August 2007 (EDT)
----
----
:::The Tribunal did not say that. It said von Papen was "active in ...helping Hitler to form the Coalition Cabinet and aided in his appointment as Chancellor," and "The Tribunal finds that von Papen is not guilty." Where in any of this is there a quesion of moral responsibiblity?
:::The Tribunal did not say that. It said von Papen was "active in ...helping Hitler to form the Coalition Cabinet and aided in his appointment as Chancellor," and "The Tribunal finds that von Papen is not guilty." Where in any of this is there a quesion of moral responsibiblity?