1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + +
Evolution example
::::: Your ad hominem attacks are not relevant to the article. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 10:41, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
::::: Your ad hominem attacks are not relevant to the article. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 10:41, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
== Evolution example ==
The section on the evolution example is hopelessly confused, and duplicated in [[Theory and fact]]. Both ought to be deleted. It makes sweeping statements about "all scientists" and "opponents of Evolution", none of which are supported. Some of it is nonsensical. It concludes "This is an unfair way to win a debate", but there is citation to anyone actually trying to win a debate that way, or to the supposed misunderstandings. I considered trying to improve it, but I think that it is hopeless. The stuff just does not belong. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:34, 30 August 2007 (EDT)