Changes

This article sites a "Dr. Norman Geisler" as an authority as a scientist or medical doctor discussing other peer-reviewed information on the "science" of the creation of the universe, the Earth, man, etc.  Dr. Norman Geisler has a Ph.D. in philosophy from Loyola University.  He holds no other advanced degrees or any other degrees in the sciences.  I graduated from law school and received a juris doctor, but I do not call myself "Dr. Baker."  This article's reference to Geisler as "Dr. Geisler" is misleading in that it implies that he is a scientist who is espousing the religious belief of creationism or summarizing the views of scientists who believe in this same view.  I'm not surprised this article was locked for editing, since its riddled with false and misleading information.  This reference to "Dr." Geisler is just one minor example.  {{unsigned|Cbaker3122}}

This article sites a "Dr. Norman Geisler" as an authority as a scientist or medical doctor discussing other peer-reviewed information on the "science" of the creation of the universe, the Earth, man, etc.  Dr. Norman Geisler has a Ph.D. in philosophy from Loyola University.  He holds no other advanced degrees or any other degrees in the sciences.  I graduated from law school and received a juris doctor, but I do not call myself "Dr. Baker."  This article's reference to Geisler as "Dr. Geisler" is misleading in that it implies that he is a scientist who is espousing the religious belief of creationism or summarizing the views of scientists who believe in this same view.  I'm not surprised this article was locked for editing, since its riddled with false and misleading information.  This reference to "Dr." Geisler is just one minor example.  {{unsigned|Cbaker3122}}

:Please quote the bit you are referring to, because I can't see anywhere that Geisler is cited "discussing other peer-reviewed information".  And why do you put quote marks around "science" in your first sentence?  Given that I can't find your single example of the article being "riddled with false and misleading information", I have serious doubt that it really is so riddled.  Perhaps demonstrating that one or a few others might (hypothetically) change my mind.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:04, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

:Please quote the bit you are referring to, because I can't see anywhere that Geisler is cited "discussing other peer-reviewed information".  And why do you put quote marks around "science" in your first sentence?  Given that I can't find your single example of the article being "riddled with false and misleading information", I have serious doubt that it really is so riddled.  Perhaps demonstrating that one or a few others might (hypothetically) change my mind.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:04, 14 July 2007 (EDT)