nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
→Correct name
:<edit conflict> I vote for '''USA PATRIOT Act of 2001''', which is technically it's full name. However, this link is really ugly, and most people won't know to use it. I'm not sure what our priorities are (or what theys should be). If we want clarity, we should stick with what we have; if we want technical correctness, we should move it to the most correct form. (Well technically '''Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001''' is the most correct, but that just breaches some boundaries of sensible practicality!!) [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 16:55, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:<edit conflict> I vote for '''USA PATRIOT Act of 2001''', which is technically it's full name. However, this link is really ugly, and most people won't know to use it. I'm not sure what our priorities are (or what theys should be). If we want clarity, we should stick with what we have; if we want technical correctness, we should move it to the most correct form. (Well technically '''Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001''' is the most correct, but that just breaches some boundaries of sensible practicality!!) [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 16:55, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
*Usually the guideline would be accuracy coupled with common usage of the subject used for searching. "Patriot Act" would seem to me to be the common use. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 17:15, 31 August 2007 (EDT)