Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett (view source)
Revision as of 01:55, September 1, 2007
, 01:55, September 1, 2007New page: In ''Celotex Corp. v. Catrett'', 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986), the United States Supreme Court held that summary judgment is appropriate when the non-moving party has the burden of ...
In ''Celotex Corp. v. Catrett'', 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986), the [[United States Supreme Court]] held that [[summary judgment]] is appropriate when the non-moving party has the burden of proof on an essential element of his case and does not make, after adequate time for discovery, a showing sufficient to establish that element.
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]