181
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + +
That was fast, and for what?
Please review the conservapedia commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments Please note the 90/10 rule. This is a friendly warning from a Conservapedia Admin. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:50, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
Please review the conservapedia commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments Please note the 90/10 rule. This is a friendly warning from a Conservapedia Admin. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:50, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
: If I may so bold as to point out, this user has made 3 edits to talk pages that add content, and 2 changes that clean up what was typed (signature and typos). My comments in ''italics''.
* 13:53, 1 September 2007 ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:BCE&diff=prev&oldid=284207]) m Talk:BCE (→BCE) -- ''Two paragraphs added''
* 13:46, 1 September 2007 ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:BCE&diff=prev&oldid=284200]) Talk:BCE (→BCE) -- ''Fixing the text previously submitted''
* 13:45, 1 September 2007 ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:BCE&diff=prev&oldid=284197]) Talk:BCE (→BCE) -- ''Adding sig to text previously submitted''
* 13:43, 1 September 2007 ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:BCE&diff=prev&oldid=284195]) m Talk:BCE (→BCE) -- ''Adding another thought to material previously submitted''
* 13:41, 1 September 2007 ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:BCE&diff=prev&oldid=284194]) m Talk:BCE (→BCE - replied to a statement.) -- ''Original content added''
: Is there enough time between the warning at 13:50 and the block at 13:57? Is adding two comments to a talk page even enough to get on the 90/10 rule? --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 14:06, 1 September 2007 (EDT)