nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 70:
Line 70: + + + +
→Sources
:::Yes, I saw that. Unfortunely it is the Congressional Quarterly. And unfortunely I have too much first hand knowledge and direct experience with Kathryn Wolfe [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=Kathryn+Wolfe%2BCongressional+Quarterly&btnG=Search] and her anonymous editing and conflict of interest as Wikipedia Admin User:Katefan0. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=katefan0%2BKathryn+Wolfe%2BCongressional+Quarterly&btnG=Search] So I'm not impressed at all with Congressional Quarterly. It ''still'' needs an authors name attached to it. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
:::Yes, I saw that. Unfortunely it is the Congressional Quarterly. And unfortunely I have too much first hand knowledge and direct experience with Kathryn Wolfe [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=Kathryn+Wolfe%2BCongressional+Quarterly&btnG=Search] and her anonymous editing and conflict of interest as Wikipedia Admin User:Katefan0. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=katefan0%2BKathryn+Wolfe%2BCongressional+Quarterly&btnG=Search] So I'm not impressed at all with Congressional Quarterly. It ''still'' needs an authors name attached to it. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 18:15, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
*Here is what actually happened:
Before and just immediately after 9/11, there were many measures before Congress, many at the White House and Justice (some of them remainders from the Clinton Administration) that were intended to deal with improving intelligence gathering, and increase national security. There were hundreds in Congress and the Executive who were already worried about the terrorists before 9/11, you know. In the aftermath of the World Trade Center, Pentagon and the airplane crash in PA, the big guns in Congress, Ashcroft and the people at the White House conducted lots of public and private meetings. Some of what are considered the most draconian components of the final act were included against the wishes of Justice and the White House, and vice-versa. That is how our government and legislative process works, like it or not. To claim Bush or Ashcroft (or even Rove) were the principle authors of the act is utter nonsense. Ashcroft was not alone in asking for the things he did, and had remarkable bi-partisan support in the Congress, mainly because his requests mirrored what was already in introduced or proposed legislation! I was there, and I can tell you there were dozens of really draconian ideas that the Administration and some Congressional leaders insisted be canned, mainly because they would have been hell to implement or administer, or were thought to be ultimately held un-Constitutional. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:34, 1 September 2007 (EDT)