Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Abortion (view source)

Revision as of 16:34, September 2, 2007

281 bytes added ,  16:34, September 2, 2007
→‎Abortion and Breast Cancer: reply
Line 270: Line 270:     
::So that allows you to ignore the studies Reuters references? Strange logic. - [[User:LouisFriend|LouisFriend]] 12:22, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::So that allows you to ignore the studies Reuters references? Strange logic. - [[User:LouisFriend|LouisFriend]] 12:22, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Every study denying an ABC link that I have looked at, such as [[Harvard Abortion Study]], I have found to be fraudulent or misleading.  How many of those pro-abortion studies have you actually looked at?  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:34, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
    
::Unfortunately you also don't seem to care about the number of methodologically sound studies that find no ABC link.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 17:08, 23 April 2007 (EDT)<br>
 
::Unfortunately you also don't seem to care about the number of methodologically sound studies that find no ABC link.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 17:08, 23 April 2007 (EDT)<br>
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,891

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/284874"

Navigation menu