Changes

:How about telling someone that a thing is okay when you know it is not, so they do it and get into trouble? We need to expand upon the ethics of truth and deceit. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 14:37, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

:How about telling someone that a thing is okay when you know it is not, so they do it and get into trouble? We need to expand upon the ethics of truth and deceit. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 14:37, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

I'll try this again:  What does the second sentence of this page (that American public schools do not teach deceit is morally wrong) have to do with defining or describing deceit?  That sentence should be eliminated <big>or</big> more institutions ignoring the teaching of deceit should be listed.  My previous deletions have been reverted without explanation or citation, description or discussion.  Is Conservapedia just a playground for people's pet pages, or are we actually interested in putting something together that correlates with the topics we try to discuss?  --[[User:Ursus|Ursus]] 19:07, 4 September 2007 (EDT)

I'll try this again:  What does the second sentence of this page (that American public schools do not teach deceit is morally wrong) have to do with defining or describing deceit?  That sentence should be eliminated <big>or</big> more institutions ignoring the teaching of deceit should be listed.  My previous deletions have been reverted without explanation or citation, description or discussion.  Is Conservapedia just a playground for people's pet pages, or are we actually interested in putting something together that correlates with the topics we try to discuss? Until it is addressed in some way, I feel like deleting the sentence is the best course of action, though I would like to see disucssion here before I try again. --[[User:Ursus|Ursus]] 19:07, 4 September 2007 (EDT)

== Reversion ==

== Reversion ==