58
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 225:
Line 225: + +
→Public Schools
: Ursus, you're not the first [[liberal]] to try to conceal the truth about [[public school]]s. They don't teach that deceit is wrong, and that statement is relevant because deceit by liberals is pervasive now. If public schools taught that deceit is wrong, then people wouldn't tolerate as much deceit as they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:21, 4 September 2007 (EDT)
: Ursus, you're not the first [[liberal]] to try to conceal the truth about [[public school]]s. They don't teach that deceit is wrong, and that statement is relevant because deceit by liberals is pervasive now. If public schools taught that deceit is wrong, then people wouldn't tolerate as much deceit as they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:21, 4 September 2007 (EDT)
:: First, thanks for immediately dragging this conversation into the gutter, Aschafly, by calling me a liberal. If you had phrased the actual [[Deceit]] page better, this conversation wouldn't be happening. Why not just put on the page something closer to what you just said? Something mentioning how the public schools are too liberal, manifesting a level of deceit. And is it really that big of a problem for you to actually talk to people about these issues/questions? Do you want good pages, or do you want pet-projects? Just in this one exchange, we've already identified a way to improve the page. Are your pages above that?
== Reversion ==
== Reversion ==