Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
GLBTs are the only group of people in which "self-identity" determines the content of their articles
Line 354: Line 354:     
: Done.  Thanks much.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:21, 23 August 2007 (EDT)
 
: Done.  Thanks much.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:21, 23 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== GLBTs are the only group of people in which "self-identity" determines the content of their articles ==
 +
 +
Midge Potts is a man (no surgery or proven hormone therapy) who "self-identifies" as a woman. Wikipedia's Manual of Style states this about identity:
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Where known, use terminology that subjects use for themselves (self-identification). This can mean using the term an individual uses for himself or herself, or using the term a group most widely uses for itself. This includes referring to transgender individuals according to the names and pronouns they use to identify themselves.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
This means that since Midge calls himself a woman, only female pronouns may be used in the article. The fact that he is still physically a man is irrelevant. When it comes to GLBTs, a person's personal opinion of their "self-identity" trumps facts on a site that claims to be encyclopedic.
 +
 +
And it is ''only'' GLBTs to whom this rule applies. No white person can "self-identify" as black and have their articles state that they are black. No nutcase like David Koresh or Charles Manson can "self-identify" as Jesus Christ and have their articles state that they actually are Jesus. Only GLBTs can have this done to their articles. Capriciousness trumps facts.  Exactly how is that either encyclopedic or unbiased? It's not. If Midge Potts were to die today, a coroner (a scientist!) examining his body would not give a rip about his "self-identity." Midge would go down on paper as being a man. Period.  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 22:37, 5 September 2007 (EDT)
Block
1,976

edits

Navigation menu