24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: − This "argument" does not take into account the fact that God is beyond our understanding and has a good reason for allowing evil that we simply can't understand.+
→The Problem of Evil: Replaced the horribly opinionated and unsourced "response" with something a bit more grounded in fact. An article on The Problem of Evil would be good.
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
A number of responses to this logical paradox have been put forth including those which assert human ignorance as the culprit, the concept of free will and the specific writings in some faiths which discuss the co-existence of good and evil (such as the book of Job in the Christian and Jewish faiths).[http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/evil-log.htm]
== Atheism and Agnosticism ==
== Atheism and Agnosticism ==