Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,157 bytes removed ,  15:16, September 7, 2007
m
Reverted edits by UKuser (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
Line 38: Line 38:     
Can anyone actually explain the point of this article; a blinkered, one sided repressive waste of time projecting its own ignorance onto others. Really there is no point to it. {{unsigned|Mrivpond}}
 
Can anyone actually explain the point of this article; a blinkered, one sided repressive waste of time projecting its own ignorance onto others. Really there is no point to it. {{unsigned|Mrivpond}}
  −
I can't believe you are calling Hugo Chavez a dictator!! You should talk to his people who see him as a great liberator, with the exception of the rich business owners.  The only reason you call him a dictator is that he has nationalised his industries, and given free healthcare and education to all, something the British goverenement did between 1945 and 1951. America supported the coup which removed Hugo Chavez from power for a short period until the people fought to get him back.  Its amazing how many dictators the US supports in South America as long as they keep up oil supplies.  This is because he has nationalised Oil and is now charging the US more for it well boo hoo.  Just becuase cheap oil is a political issue in the US doesn't mean you should go around bullying countries for trying to improve the lives of their people.  If he was a dictator why weren't the people pleased to see him go? Don't quote US new station either as prove the shots of people shooting into a crowd were doctored the same camera pulls away to show an empty street. I hope all of South America get 'dictators' like him i will certainly improve their standards.
 
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits

Navigation menu