5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + +
User talk:Aziraphale/Arbitration (view source)
Revision as of 15:41, September 7, 2007
, 15:41, September 7, 2007→Others?
Is this open to others to offer comments, or is it by it's nature of being a dispute or for whatever reason limited to Conservative and Ungtss? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:19, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Is this open to others to offer comments, or is it by it's nature of being a dispute or for whatever reason limited to Conservative and Ungtss? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:19, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
: I'd love to open it up to other opinions, if Aziraphale + Conservative are okay with that. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:31, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
: I'd love to open it up to other opinions, if Aziraphale + Conservative are okay with that. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 11:31, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
::Hi Philip,
::Well, first of all, I don't think there are any established rules at CP for this process. Perhaps we'll set some precedent but at the moment I'm just using my best judgment.
::I welcome the opinions of others, and yours in particular. :) That said, I'm fearful of two things: scope creep and drawing out the process. So please, yes, comments are welcome. I hope to put this to bed by Monday, Tuesday at the latest and, (not being a sysop, I'm trying to keep my focus on resolving the communication issues between Ungtss and Conservative and providing Andy with my best recommendation. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 11:41, 7 September 2007 (EDT)