852
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 578:
Line 578: + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 17:08, March 12, 2007
, 17:08, March 12, 2007no edit summary
::: Fantastic! I added a new point 2 on your stuff. Will add more also. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:52, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
::: Fantastic! I added a new point 2 on your stuff. Will add more also. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:52, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
:::: I have to object to some of this. While I agree that some of these discuss ideas or topics that are absurd (Anti-racist mathematics is one that particularly annoys me) they are legitimate topics of articles and Wikipedia would be remiss not to have articles on these topics. Similarly, Wikipedia has articles on flat-earthism, white power, black power, and phrenology, not out of endorsement for their ideas but because they are encyclopedic topics. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 15:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
:::: I have to object to some of this. While I agree that some of these discuss ideas or topics that are absurd (Anti-racist mathematics is one that particularly annoys me) they are legitimate topics of articles and Wikipedia would be remiss not to have articles on these topics. Similarly, Wikipedia has articles on flat-earthism, white power, black power, and phrenology, not out of endorsement for their ideas but because they are encyclopedic topics. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 15:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
== Redirect ==
Is there a reason the Wikipedia entry redirects to the Example of Bias page? I could have sworn there were two separate articles yesterday. And if this is done for a reason, it might be helpful to remove the links within the Bias page that link to itself through the wikipedia page. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT)