nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
no edit summary
:Hmm... You mean that you have higher standards when it comes smearing conservatives? For liberals comments like this would be ok? That must be it, because how could there otherwise be an uncited entry like: "He also may have been involved in smuggling cocaine through an airport in Mena, Arkansas, although these allegations are disputed by some." on the high standard article from Bill Clinton. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 11:52, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
:Hmm... You mean that you have higher standards when it comes smearing conservatives? For liberals comments like this would be ok? That must be it, because how could there otherwise be an uncited entry like: "He also may have been involved in smuggling cocaine through an airport in Mena, Arkansas, although these allegations are disputed by some." on the high standard article from Bill Clinton. [[User:WillM|WillM]] 11:52, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
::If you have a difficulty with some aspect of the Bill Clinton article I would suggest taking it up on the talk page. I think of you check the article history you will see that a number of negative comments about Clinton that have come in over time were reverted. But the idea of 'Hey there's a comment on possible cocaine smuggling during the time that he was governor on a section called scandal near the bottom of Clinton's article, so an appropriate response would be to mention that Sean Hannity was caught drinking and driving when he was 16 in his main paragraph' is not going to fly here. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 12:05, 7 September 2007 (EDT)