16
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="orange">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="yellow">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="green">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="blue">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>+ − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="indigo">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center> − <center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="purple">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
Sturges v. Crowinshield (view source)
Revision as of 18:31, September 7, 2007
, 18:31, September 7, 2007Undo revision 288126 by Special:Contributions/HeroicFlyingCat (User talk:HeroicFlyingCat)
a<center><div style="text-decoration:blink"><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><font color="red">This page has been [[classified]] in accordance with the [[Patriot Act]].</font></big></big></big></big></big></big></big></div></center>
''Sturges v. Crowinshield'' was a U.S. Supreme Court decision written by Chief Justice [[John Marshall]]. This decision invalidated a state law of bankruptcy for its violation of the [[Obligation of Contract Clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]], Article I, Section 10, Clause 1.
The Court held, "the act of New-York, which is pleaded in this case, so far as it attempts to discharge the contract on which this suit was instituted, is a law impairing the obligation of contracts within the meaning of the constitution of the United States, and that the plea of the defendant is not a good and sufficient bar of the plaintiff's action." 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 122, 208 (1819).
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]