325
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:Aziraphale/Arbitration (view source)
Revision as of 18:48, September 7, 2007
, 18:48, September 7, 2007→Primary: possible formatting
::You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
::You are absolutely correct...I totally missed that. Might I then suggest you format a "side-by-side" section so everyone can see what and where disagreement(s) arise. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 14:08, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
:::No worries, Samwell. As for the formatting, if I can figure out how to wikify what you're describing I'll do so. In the meantime, the topics and subtopics hopefully will help keep thoughts on particular subjects discreet from each other. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:23, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-Az also springs eternal...''
:::No worries, Samwell. As for the formatting, if I can figure out how to wikify what you're describing I'll do so. In the meantime, the topics and subtopics hopefully will help keep thoughts on particular subjects discreet from each other. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:23, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-Az also springs eternal...''
::::I'll do a short section to let you know how the code looks.
__NOTOC__
<!-- uncomment this if you want a color code
== Color Code ==
* <span style="background-color:#CDCDB4">
* <span style="background-color:#fff68f">
* <span style="background-color:#ffffe0">
* <span style="background-color:#FFDAB9">
-->
<table width=100% cellspacing=10>
<tr>
<td width=45% valign=top>
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#c0c0c0;font-size:135%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid 000000;text-align:center;color:#f6f7ff;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">Conservative</h2>
</td><td width=45% valign=top>
<h2 style="margin:0;background-color:#c0c0c0;font-size:135%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid 000000;text-align:center;color:#f6f7ff;padding:0.2em 0.4em;">'''Ungtss'''</h2>
</td></tr>
<tr><td valign=top>
{Place [[User:Conservative|Conservative's]] arguments here}
</td><td valign=top style="background-color:">
{Place [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss']] arguments here}
</td></tr><tr><td valign=top>
<big><big>'''Conservative'''</big></big>
I believe that Ungtss's alleged quest for neutrality is not genuine. Why? Because Ungtss made the argument that based on ex-atheist Christian testimony that they once did disbelieve in the existence of God we should say that atheists disbelieve in the existence of God. In short, while we should note that some theists disbelieve that bona fide atheists exist we should state that atheist do exist (actually disbelieve in the existence of God). Thus, we should not be neutral. However, Ungtss seems to dislike certain material like the material regarding the average atheist's uncharitableness and similar material as it seems to chaffe against his liberal notion of what the esssential nature of man is like. I would also point out that Ungtss refuses to answer the question: "Is atheism a sin?" [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:55, 4 September 2007 (EDT)
</td><td valign=top style="background-color:">
<big><big>'''Ungtss'''</big></big>
Please read what I wrote again, carefully. I'm not selling what you think I'm selling. I never made that argument. I listed a number of reasons, to which you never responded. My primary concern is with the tone of the article and clarity. The article sounds bizarre and paranoid as is, and we lose credibility instantly. The Bible verse says "The fool says in his heart, there is no God." That means, Conservative, that some people say in their heart that there is no God. Your evidence for the claim "there are no bona fide atheists" is the unsubstantiated opinion of theists. My evidence for the claim "at least some atheists are bona fide" is the personal experience of former atheists.<br>
Please read again what I wrote. I'm not selling what you think I'm selling. I'm suggesting that we choose simplicity and clarity, rather than changing every "believes" to a "claims to believe," which carries a hostile and paranoid tone.<br>
When have I ever objected to having that material in the article? [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 17:51, 4 September 2007
</td></tr><tr><td valign=top>
<!--Ending code--> </td></tr></table>
Be sure to include the ending code or it'll continue to split