4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + + + +
Debate:Was world war inevitable? (view source)
Revision as of 21:02, September 7, 2007
, 21:02, September 7, 2007→'''No:'''
:Hitler was a sensitive man. It was all the fault of the war-mongering generals. [[User:Hitler was a sensitive man|Hitler was a sensitive man]] 14:41, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
:Hitler was a sensitive man. It was all the fault of the war-mongering generals. [[User:Hitler was a sensitive man|Hitler was a sensitive man]] 14:41, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
I regret to see that there is no footnote or citation for the assertation that "Hitler was a sensitive man." I recomend that you watch the musical number "Springtime for Hitler," from Mel Brook's "The Producers." If only it wern't a massive joke, then you might have a point.
While many of Hitler's Generals assisted him quite willingly with his various unprovoked and brutal attacks on innocent nations, he was undoutably the driving force behind the Nazi ambition to take over and enslave the world. His Generals didn't propose the extermination of the Jewish and Slavic races. Hitler proposed that in "Mein Kampf." The majority of his generals didn't feel ready to invade Poland or to fight the Allied Nations.
While the German People and Military need to take responsibility for their actions, they were guided and spurred on by Hitler. Adolf led them to hights of barbarism rarely surpassed in human history. Whoever thinks that Hitler was a sensitive man should read more history, pariticularly "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" by William Shier, "Stalin and Hitler, Parallel Lives" or anything by a real historian.
== '''None of the Above:''' ==
== '''None of the Above:''' ==