Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 585: Line 585:  
<div style="border: 1px dashed rgb(170, 170, 170); padding: 5px;">We don't need two separate entries about Wikipedia and its bias.  The protection was required because people were putting in false statements like non-Americans are more intelligent and Conservapedia should be criticized (for its free speech?).  The entry became a place for Wikipedians to spread more falsehoods.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)</div>
 
<div style="border: 1px dashed rgb(170, 170, 170); padding: 5px;">We don't need two separate entries about Wikipedia and its bias.  The protection was required because people were putting in false statements like non-Americans are more intelligent and Conservapedia should be criticized (for its free speech?).  The entry became a place for Wikipedians to spread more falsehoods.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)</div>
 
:There is much I want to say in reply to this, but at best, it wouldn't change his mind, and at worst, it would get me banned. Let's just smile and nod, it takes less energy than fighting a lost fight. *shrugs* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 13:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:There is much I want to say in reply to this, but at best, it wouldn't change his mind, and at worst, it would get me banned. Let's just smile and nod, it takes less energy than fighting a lost fight. *shrugs* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 13:38, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:: Thanks for pointing that out.  But in response to [[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s reason, couldn't the wikipedia article be an article about wikipedia, not it's bias? like starting date, multiple languages, etc and the Bias page be used for the bias info? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:46, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
852

edits

Navigation menu