6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 153:
Line 153: + +
Talk:Tyrannosaurus rex (view source)
Revision as of 17:47, September 8, 2007
, 17:47, September 8, 2007→Hojimachongtalk, you broke a Conservapedia rule. It is not a fact there is very little evidence.
::You are mistaken. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tyrannosaurus_rex&diff=65031&oldid=64969 Your edit] had the article saying, "this [creationist] view is supported by very little scientific evidence". There's no qualifier there that that's what most mainstream scientists believe. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:43, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
::You are mistaken. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tyrannosaurus_rex&diff=65031&oldid=64969 Your edit] had the article saying, "this [creationist] view is supported by very little scientific evidence". There's no qualifier there that that's what most mainstream scientists believe. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:43, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
::Actually more than just being supported by very little scientific evidence, any view in which the earth or entire universe is no more than 10,000 years old is completely disproven by scientific fact. I'm sorry you prefer the ostrich method of learning to actual honest research. You are aware that starting from a conclusion and accepting evidence which supports your prefered conclusionw hile rejecting out of hand anything which negates it is not a valid reasoning trail, right?
== Incivility is not appropriate, Hojimachong ==
== Incivility is not appropriate, Hojimachong ==