| Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| | | | |
| | *We will wait and see how long they remain fixed.....--<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:06, 8 September 2007 (EDT) | | *We will wait and see how long they remain fixed.....--<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:06, 8 September 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | : I'll start at your beginning and if your claims of correction don't hold true for the first few, then I'm going to stop wasting time on your list: |
| | + | |
| | + | *1) "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deceit Deceit]" now redirects to lie. |
| | + | |
| | + | :: Deceit does not have the same meaning as lie. That redirect is improper, misleading, and illustrates the merit of the complaint. |
| | + | |
| | + | *3) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Schwarz Fred Schwarz] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons] have both had all mention of JBS removed from their entries. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Dravecky Dave Dravecky's] article does make it clear that his association with JBS is merely claimed by one newspaper, but that may still constitute a smear... |
| | + | |
| | + | :: The JBS reference in the Fred Schwarz has been removed, but the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons still has the JBS reference. Your statement to the contrary is false. |
| | + | |
| | + | *4) The mention of JBS in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Costello Jerry Costello's] article was re-added. If this association still isn't justified, then this point should simply be added to example 3. |
| | + | |
| | + | :: The association is not justified. It's plainly an improper attempt at guilt-by-association. |
| | + | |
| | + | *13) A quote from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zach_Johnson Zach Johnson] to this effect has been added. |
| | + | |
| | + | :: The Zach Johnson entry does finally admit that he credited [[Jesus Christ]], but the [[liberal]]s on [[Wikipedia]] insert a "citation needed" to try to discredit Johnson's quote. The effect remains similar to before. |
| | + | |
| | + | *15) The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society John Birch Society article] no longer smears any conservatives by labelling them as "allies". |
| | + | |
| | + | :: The John Birch Society entry does continue to smear unrelated people. |
| | + | |
| | + | *23) The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia Conservapedia article] no longer implies that the "concerns" were some sort of general consensus: it properly attributes the quote to Jimmy Wales. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::I didn't bother rechecking this, but why is Jimmy Wales given preferential treatment in an entry about Conservapedia? He has no connection with Conservapedia, and it's unclear he's even spent any time on this site. |
| | + | |
| | + | *24) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw Operation Eagle Claw] mentions Carter's determination to complete the operation before the election, and no longer tries to blame its failure for Carter's crash in 1980. |
| | + | |
| | + | :: The rewording continues to obscure the timing of Operation Eagle Claw during unpopular Carter's difficult primary battle with [[Ted Kennedy]] for the [[Democratic]] nomination. The new explanation seems determined to confuse the political implications of the operation as the old explanation did. |
| | + | |
| | + | :: I stopped at this point, and see no need to change the examples of bias on the above points. The changes often did not occur as stated, and where changes did occur they merely underscore the bias further. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | == What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? == | | == What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? == |