Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Carey v. Musladin (view source)

Revision as of 05:03, September 9, 2007

787 bytes added ,  05:03, September 9, 2007
New page: In ''Carey v. Musladin'', 127 S. Ct. 649 (2006), the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed a state court ruling that buttons displaying a murder victim's image worn by the victim's family during...
In ''Carey v. Musladin'', 127 S. Ct. 649 (2006), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] affirmed a state court ruling that buttons displaying a murder victim's image worn by the victim's family during respondent's trial did not deny respondent his right to a fair trial.

Justice [[Clarence Thomas]], writing for the court, wrote that the state court's ruling was not contrary to clearly established federal law, and was not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

The Court recognized that certain courtroom practices are so inherently prejudicial that they deprive the defendant of a fair trial. ''Estelle v. Williams'', 425 U.S. 501, 503-506 (1976); ''Holbrook v. Flynn'', 475 U.S. 560, 568 (1986).
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/289244"

Navigation menu