Changes

:: I stopped at this point, and see no need to change the examples of bias on the above points.  The changes often did not occur as stated, and where changes did occur they merely underscore the bias further.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)

:: I stopped at this point, and see no need to change the examples of bias on the above points.  The changes often did not occur as stated, and where changes did occur they merely underscore the bias further.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:19, 8 September 2007 (EDT)

::I apologize then... particularly for the JBS reference in the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons article, I don't know how I missed that one. As for the "deceit" example, I thought deceit and lie might be essentially synonymous, hence Conservapedia not needing an article on "lie"... but you're right, claiming they are one and the same is misleading. Sorry, I genuinely thought these might constitute valid corrections.

:::I apologize then... particularly for the JBS reference in the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons article, I don't know how I missed that one. As for the "deceit" example, I thought deceit and lie might be essentially synonymous, hence Conservapedia not needing an article on "lie"... but you're right, claiming they are one and the same is misleading. Sorry, I genuinely thought these might constitute valid corrections.

[[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:02, 8 September 2007 (EDT)

:::[[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:02, 8 September 2007 (EDT)

== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==

== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==