20
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + +
Debate:Abortion and Artificial Consciousness (view source)
Revision as of 00:45, September 10, 2007
, 00:45, September 10, 2007no edit summary
: It isn't the same at all. Computers do not have souls. [[User:CalebRookwood|CalebRookwood]] 20:25, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
: It isn't the same at all. Computers do not have souls. [[User:CalebRookwood|CalebRookwood]] 20:25, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
:: An artificial conciousness could be thought of as a human brain in a robot. In my opinion, such a being would indeed have a soul. I doubt that organic composition is a prerequisite for a theological presence. If you debate that, imagine that I'm constructing a fully-functional human out of living cells. Would it be immoral to stop? --[[User:Turing100111010|Turing100111010]] 20:45, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
::Your link doesn't work. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:27, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
::Your link doesn't work. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:27, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
:::Hmm, that's odd. I thought that WP had a separate article on it… what's your opinion on the subject, Bohdan? --[[User:Turing100111010|Turing100111010]] 20:45, 9 September 2007 (EDT)