Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
''A Wonderful Life'' and ''Mr. Smith Goes to Washington''
Line 209: Line 209:     
:The tripod ref is confusing: [http://drhill.tripod.com/ssi3240/pdf/lecture8.htm] It says Americans have the right to belief as they want, as long as they don't advocate overthrowing the government. But it also complains that SAG vowed not to hire actors and writers who belong to groups which "advocate overthrowing the goverment. Doctor Hill can't have it both ways. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 01:02, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:The tripod ref is confusing: [http://drhill.tripod.com/ssi3240/pdf/lecture8.htm] It says Americans have the right to belief as they want, as long as they don't advocate overthrowing the government. But it also complains that SAG vowed not to hire actors and writers who belong to groups which "advocate overthrowing the goverment. Doctor Hill can't have it both ways. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 01:02, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== ''A Wonderful Life'' and ''Mr. Smith Goes to Washington'' ==
 +
 +
I question whether these movies should be included here.  They are based on liberal, populist ideas that are hokey and don't reflect reality.  The first has as its hero a man who runs an S&L and as its villain a banker.  The second subscribes to the point of view that big business controls Washington.  I would propose removing them. [[User:Tradcon|Traditional Conservative]] 22:31, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
43

edits

Navigation menu