Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 214: Line 214:  
I question whether these movies should be included here.  They are based on liberal, populist ideas that are hokey and don't reflect reality.  The first has as its hero a man who runs an S&L and as its villain a banker.  The second subscribes to the point of view that big business controls Washington.  I would propose removing them. [[User:Tradcon|Traditional Conservative]] 22:31, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
 
I question whether these movies should be included here.  They are based on liberal, populist ideas that are hokey and don't reflect reality.  The first has as its hero a man who runs an S&L and as its villain a banker.  The second subscribes to the point of view that big business controls Washington.  I would propose removing them. [[User:Tradcon|Traditional Conservative]] 22:31, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Obvious troll. A warning would be appropriate, IMO. --[[User:Turing100111010|Turing100111010]] 23:09, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Obvious troll. A warning would be appropriate, IMO. --[[User:Turing100111010|Turing100111010]] 23:09, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*Traditional Conservative's would see the point, not reject it!  We are not pro big business, for the sake of big business, and the Savings and Loan idea is a conservative one, reflecting local control, and de-centralization of banking, away from Washington, and to the local communities.  Liberalism supports more central control, and an elitist, anti-individual POV...wherein only the elite of D.C. know what is best for the people.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 03:06, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu