Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − − Creation science is not accepted by most scientists either in terms of its claims<ref>95% of scientists accept the theory of evolution. Robinson, B.A., [http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm Public beliefs about evolution and creation], Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, May 7, 2007.</ref> or as a science, {{fact}} but it is claimed by creation scientists that this is due mainly to the worldviews and preconceptions of the scientists, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence{{fact}}. − − Although a belief in God, does not automatically imply a belief in creationisim, it is interesting to note that a poll among United States scientists showed that approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God <ref> http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html</ref>, while a similar survey found that 93% of members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God <ref> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> − −
no edit summary
'''Creation science''' is a systematic attempt to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible— usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—rather than the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].
'''Creation science''' is a systematic attempt to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible— usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—rather than the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]].
== Creation Science and Genetic Programs and Biological Information ==
== Creation Science and Genetic Programs and Biological Information ==
''For more on the topic of the origin of biological information see:''[[Intelligent design]]
''For more on the topic of the origin of biological information see:''[[Intelligent design]]