Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  23:35, September 13, 2007
Line 53: Line 53:  
::::That last paragraph in particular cracks me up. "In this model, the laws of physics are suspended while creation is in progress..." followed two sentences later by "No non-physical requirements are placed on the model."  Brilliant! [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 09:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 
::::That last paragraph in particular cracks me up. "In this model, the laws of physics are suspended while creation is in progress..." followed two sentences later by "No non-physical requirements are placed on the model."  Brilliant! [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 09:51, 10 March 2007 (EST)
   −
:::Sid, I would point out that Occam's razor is applied is a [[Ceteris paribus]] principle and perhaps you should consider that this is a complicated issue (for example the Big Bang theory has a starlight problem) and not write in stone that the "constants" have not changed in the past.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:34, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
+
Sid, I would point out that Occam's razor is applied is a [[Ceteris paribus]] principle and perhaps you should consider that this is a complicated issue (for example the Big Bang theory has a starlight problem) and not write in stone that the "constants" have not changed in the past.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:34, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
    
==The value of what?==
 
==The value of what?==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,395

edits

Navigation menu