Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 200: Line 200:     
: I reread #18 (now #20) and updated the minor revision in the "misquoted" section in the footnote.  Wikipedia changed "predominantly Christian" to "nominally Christian."  Whoopee.  The rest of your criticisms of #18 (now #20) have even less merit.  The Wikipedia meta page does complain about Christian "bias" in older sources.  Too bad that [[liberal]]s can't realize the difference between identity, perspective and bias.  #18 (now #20) is correct but you have given me another point to add to [[liberal style]] here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:29, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
 
: I reread #18 (now #20) and updated the minor revision in the "misquoted" section in the footnote.  Wikipedia changed "predominantly Christian" to "nominally Christian."  Whoopee.  The rest of your criticisms of #18 (now #20) have even less merit.  The Wikipedia meta page does complain about Christian "bias" in older sources.  Too bad that [[liberal]]s can't realize the difference between identity, perspective and bias.  #18 (now #20) is correct but you have given me another point to add to [[liberal style]] here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:29, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Admission of Liberal Bias ==
 +
 +
No complaints this time, I just thought I may have found a suitable addition to the list. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia#Liberal_bias Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales actually admits Wikipedia has a liberal bias] (original source [http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/email_debatewales_discusses_po.html here]). According to Jimmy Wales, "the Wikipedia community is slightly more liberal than the U.S. population on average." ''Slightly?'' Try '''six times''' more liberal.
 +
 +
Add or reject as you see fit. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 20:06, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902

edits

Navigation menu