Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
835 bytes added ,  00:56, September 15, 2007
→‎Protests: gimme a break
Line 27: Line 27:  
:Cite an instance where that's not true.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:33, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Cite an instance where that's not true.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:33, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Are you serious? You believe that Martin Luther King Jr. was driven by Satan and lied constantly?  Or that Bobby Kennedy was?  Or Susan B. Anthony? Or Rev. V. Gene Robinson? Or Cecil Williams?  --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 14:54, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Are you serious? You believe that Martin Luther King Jr. was driven by Satan and lied constantly?  Or that Bobby Kennedy was?  Or Susan B. Anthony? Or Rev. V. Gene Robinson? Or Cecil Williams?  --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 14:54, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
 
+
:::Here's the point about [[deceit]]: the biggest victim of deceit is when the deceitful person begins beleiving his/her/it/transgender's own lies.  Thus, a person driven by Satan can lie to themself that they are not, when in fact they  actually are.  Now, if you are a rational person, you surely can understand this perfectly logical point.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 20:56, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Jesus? His message was love. He was anti-violence. Pretty liberal, eh? [[User:Jsusman|Jsusman]] 09:32, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Jesus? His message was love. He was anti-violence. Pretty liberal, eh? [[User:Jsusman|Jsusman]] 09:32, 12 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Love is the liberal message?  All I hear is spewing hate.  You might have love confused with unnatural acts of copulation, which is pretty much all the Democratic party & liberalism has stood for now for the past 10 or 15 years.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:58, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:Love is the liberal message?  All I hear is spewing hate.  You might have love confused with unnatural acts of copulation, which is pretty much all the Democratic party & liberalism has stood for now for the past 10 or 15 years.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:58, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
Line 33: Line 33:     
"spewing hate" pretty much sums up my criticism of ann coulter. I'm not here to fight the big conservo vs. lib battle, to debate the bible vs other ideas - just to help write conservapedia. Ann coulter says hateful things. She's certainly an intellectual, and makes people think, but - to sum it up- i think the entry loses perspective and validity by not examining her methods in detail. If we all thought like ann spoke, where would we be as a society? [[User:Jsusman|Jsusman]] 09:35, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
 
"spewing hate" pretty much sums up my criticism of ann coulter. I'm not here to fight the big conservo vs. lib battle, to debate the bible vs other ideas - just to help write conservapedia. Ann coulter says hateful things. She's certainly an intellectual, and makes people think, but - to sum it up- i think the entry loses perspective and validity by not examining her methods in detail. If we all thought like ann spoke, where would we be as a society? [[User:Jsusman|Jsusman]] 09:35, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Please refrain from spewing hate against Ann Coulter;  Coulter in reality is parody of liberals we've all been forced to accept as rational spokespeople for liberal ideals for more than half a century.  Libs can dish it out, but when a Limbaugh, Coulter, or Savage pantomimes liberal's ideas of rational discourse and civility on public affairs, suddenly it becomes hate speech.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 20:56, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430

edits

Navigation menu