Changes

My guess is that the teen music is the most likely explanation if the claim of 21,544 is true  Lastly, can we look at enough of the articles which mention suicide to see in what context in which suicide was mentioned?  Also, do we believe the above material or similar material would be appropriate to mention in the "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia" article for the entry dealing with suicide and do we want to develop this more.  '''I ask this because I know someone in the conservative press who might be very interested in this claim if it is true.  His organization reaches millions and it has an international reader base.  We are currently working on a story together and he might be interested in this one too if I can verify the claim.''' [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:43, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

My guess is that the teen music is the most likely explanation if the claim of 21,544 is true  Lastly, can we look at enough of the articles which mention suicide to see in what context in which suicide was mentioned?  Also, do we believe the above material or similar material would be appropriate to mention in the "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia" article for the entry dealing with suicide and do we want to develop this more.  '''I ask this because I know someone in the conservative press who might be very interested in this claim if it is true.  His organization reaches millions and it has an international reader base.  We are currently working on a story together and he might be interested in this one too if I can verify the claim.''' [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:43, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

: A search of Conservapedia shows that it has 0.8% of its articles mentioning suicide (144/16536). Those numbers are remarkably similar given the size of each collection.  If this is a critique of one, it is likewise a critique of the other... unless Conservapedia is to remove instances of the word from its articles too (but then it would either be using euphemisms which reduces the impact of the word or avoiding history that is likely importance at showing the distasteful nature of it). --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:54, 14 September 2007 (EDT)

: A search of Conservapedia shows that it has 0.87% of its articles mentioning suicide (144/16536). Those numbers are remarkably similar given the size of each collection.  If this is a critique of one, it is likewise a critique of the other... unless Conservapedia is to remove instances of the word from its articles too (but then it would either be using euphemisms which reduces the impact of the word or avoiding history that is likely importance at showing the distasteful nature of it). --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 21:54, 14 September 2007 (EDT)