Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 274:
Line 274: − +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:06, September 15, 2007
, 23:06, September 15, 2007→Wikipedia does NOT describe deceit as a "post-punk" rock album that is "austere, brilliant and indescribable."
::::::Is there some alternate wording (which you would allow me to insert to Wikipedia as GFDL) which might solve this problem? One major semantic problem I see with changing the current wording is that it is possible to deceive by accident without moral slight - the Wikipedia entry's alleged lack of morality is partly based on this. [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 17:33, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
::::::Is there some alternate wording (which you would allow me to insert to Wikipedia as GFDL) which might solve this problem? One major semantic problem I see with changing the current wording is that it is possible to deceive by accident without moral slight - the Wikipedia entry's alleged lack of morality is partly based on this. [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 17:33, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
:I agree that Wikipedia's definition of deception stinks. "not necessarily true"? Show me a dictionary or encyclopedia that states the "not necessarily true" idea associated with Wikipedia's lousy definition. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:06, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
:I agree that Wikipedia's definition of deception stinks. "not necessarily true"? Show me a dictionary or encyclopedia that states the "not necessarily true" idea associated with Wikipedia's lousy definition of deception. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:06, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
=="philanthropist"==
=="philanthropist"==