3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 73:
Line 73: + + +
→"This is Conservapedia"
: '''REPLY:''' There are no benefits. The mother's health is harmed by abortion , as shown by cited studies, and what happens to the child is obvious. If you claim there are benefits, then you have prove your case.
: '''REPLY:''' There are no benefits. The mother's health is harmed by abortion , as shown by cited studies, and what happens to the child is obvious. If you claim there are benefits, then you have prove your case.
::But an abortion procedure (a legal one at least) is statistically safer than childbirth. Also, if a women has no children, then she does not have the lower risk of breast cancer gained when having a child, but surely she has not increased her risk of cancer, rather she has not decreased it. [[User:Smudgepuss|Smudgepuss]] 17:44, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
*if the pro-choice movement funds the Democrat party, there should be an equal discussion about the funding activities of the pro-life party
*if the pro-choice movement funds the Democrat party, there should be an equal discussion about the funding activities of the pro-life party