90
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 370:
Line 370: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 18:00, September 18, 2007
, 18:00, September 18, 2007National Enquirer revisited
<br><br><br><br>
<br><br><br><br>
We have heard what you think. Repeating it again, for the one hundredth time will not make anyone notice you more, or agree with you more or less. Please sit down now. Thank you. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 01:41, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
We have heard what you think. Repeating it again, for the one hundredth time will not make anyone notice you more, or agree with you more or less. Please sit down now. Thank you. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 01:41, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
== National Enquirer revisited ==
Okay, there still isn't a source that says that Wikipedia is "The National Enquirer of the Internet." I took a look on Google and didn't see that quote applied to Wikipedia, reputable source or otherwise. Big-A, are you still going to defend use of that phrase on this article? It doesn't help Conservapedia's reputation to have an uncited claim on this article. Thank you, [[User:PostoStudanto|PostoStudanto]] 14:00, 18 September 2007 (EDT)