Changes

I wouldn't even call that a controversy to begin with. ''Somebody'' inside the NYT offices made a silly edit that got instantly reverted. It's not exactly something that led to frontpage news, angry comments, or whatever. (If there were any, please add references to them - I don't see any) --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:36, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

I wouldn't even call that a controversy to begin with. ''Somebody'' inside the NYT offices made a silly edit that got instantly reverted. It's not exactly something that led to frontpage news, angry comments, or whatever. (If there were any, please add references to them - I don't see any) --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:36, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

*What you added, Jenkins, is ''spin'', worthy of a Times employee or a [[Deceit|Liberal]]. But it was an unsubstantiated conjecture.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font>} 20:31, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

*What you added, Jenkins, is ''spin'', worthy of a Times employee or a [[Deceit|Liberal]]. But it was an unsubstantiated conjecture as to their intent, eh?  And please stop with fact templates on stuff that is a truism, such as the politics of the publisher.  If you have time to run around inserting those, you have the time to find the appropriate citation to prove or disprove. That is the job of an editor. Not some other editor, YOUR job.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font>} 20:31, 20 September 2007 (EDT)