Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:  
::And no, it would be the fact of the editor who MAKES THE CLAIM. I happen not to know that guy, and he doesn't seem to have an article. So to casual readers, it's not a truism, it's an unsourced claim. And from what I see, the claim becomes "true" with the reasoning "The NYT is liberal because the guy is liberal, and the guy is liberal because he's the chief of the NYT". But fine, I'll do the job of whoever made the claim and do his/her research. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:43, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::And no, it would be the fact of the editor who MAKES THE CLAIM. I happen not to know that guy, and he doesn't seem to have an article. So to casual readers, it's not a truism, it's an unsourced claim. And from what I see, the claim becomes "true" with the reasoning "The NYT is liberal because the guy is liberal, and the guy is liberal because he's the chief of the NYT". But fine, I'll do the job of whoever made the claim and do his/her research. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:43, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::Wow, googling for '''"Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr" radical leftist''' gives this article as the first result. Truism indeed... but maybe there actually is a source... --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:45, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::Wow, googling for '''"Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr" radical leftist''' gives this article as the first result. Truism indeed... but maybe there actually is a source... --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:45, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*I will soon be wishing you Godspeed, Jenkins, I can just feel it in my bones! You can take your attitude and pack it up anytime you are ready.  You are full of [[deceit]] in your twisting of everything, and we can do without that.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 20:52, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu