Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 46: Line 46:  
::: I added them about 2 minutes before your reply here. [[User:CalebRookwood|CalebRookwood]] 21:05, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::: I added them about 2 minutes before your reply here. [[User:CalebRookwood|CalebRookwood]] 21:05, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:here is a confirmation of the blog from Okrent himself: "Times publisher Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. doesn't think this walk through The Times is a tour of liberalism. He prefers to call the paper's viewpoint "urban." He says that the tumultuous, polyglot metropolitan environment The Times occupies means "We're less easily shocked," and that the paper reflects "a value system that recognizes the power of flexibility."[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:04, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
:here is a confirmation of the blog from Okrent himself: "Times publisher Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. doesn't think this walk through The Times is a tour of liberalism. He prefers to call the paper's viewpoint "urban." He says that the tumultuous, polyglot metropolitan environment The Times occupies means "We're less easily shocked," and that the paper reflects "a value system that recognizes the power of flexibility."[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/25/weekinreview/25bott.html?ei=5088&en=452926dcb11511a3&ex=1248667200&pagewanted=all&position=] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:04, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*The Times own ombudsmen wrote in answer to the same question:  "Of course it does!". Better check the available sources again.....--<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:11, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
    
== NY Times liberal Bias affects other media according to reporter John Stossel ==
 
== NY Times liberal Bias affects other media according to reporter John Stossel ==
    
Here is what I found: "Stossel also used the occasion to take a swipe at The New York Times and The Washington Post. While the newspapers reach only a fraction of people compared to the television networks, he said radio and television producers rely heavily on their contents. "The reason the Times, and to a lesser extent the Post, are so important, and they are, is because the TV and radio - all of the media - copy it sycophantically," he said. "That's how bias at the Times becomes bias in other media."[http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200401/CUL20040128a.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:59, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Here is what I found: "Stossel also used the occasion to take a swipe at The New York Times and The Washington Post. While the newspapers reach only a fraction of people compared to the television networks, he said radio and television producers rely heavily on their contents. "The reason the Times, and to a lesser extent the Post, are so important, and they are, is because the TV and radio - all of the media - copy it sycophantically," he said. "That's how bias at the Times becomes bias in other media."[http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200401/CUL20040128a.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:59, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu