Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,417
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 201:
Line 201: − − :Well there is a big difference between a coercive tax to fund a socialist/liberal mouthpiece of lies, and a beg-a-thon where they whine and plead for cash cause thier going broke buying gas for thier Volvos. − − :They only real similiarities between the BBC & CPB is in the programming aimed at snobs with thier nose stuck so far up in the air, they need coercive laws to force common scum not only to pay for thier entertainment, but also their perverted ideas of "news." [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:57, 15 September 2007 (EDT) − − ==Reversion== − It makes no difference. We've identified the (a) the [[extremist]] nature and intent of paid staff, and (b) the use of NYT offices and facilities to perpetuate vicious and defamatory smears. Until we have evidence of an internal investigation and disciplinary action, the rather lame excuse they were caught wtih thier hands in the cookie jar is insufficient. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 13:51, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Talk:Liberal bias (view source)
Revision as of 17:51, September 21, 2007
, 17:51, September 21, 2007Reverted edits by RobS (Talk); changed back to last version by Celtish
Although the BBC is technically not-for-profit it does have an enormous worldwide revenue from the resale of programmes and repeat fees, from the sale of CDs, videos, DVDs, and a wide range of books and magazines. It is in fact a major publisher in its own right. [[User:Celtish|celtish]] 21:38, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
Although the BBC is technically not-for-profit it does have an enormous worldwide revenue from the resale of programmes and repeat fees, from the sale of CDs, videos, DVDs, and a wide range of books and magazines. It is in fact a major publisher in its own right. [[User:Celtish|celtish]] 21:38, 14 September 2007 (EDT)