Some challenge this argument on the basis that premises one and two have not been proven. They argue:
Some challenge this argument on the basis that premises one and two have not been proven. They argue:
−
* Those ascribing to [[compatibilism]] believe that our experience of free will is compatible with the idea that all things are determined by natural causes. Their point of view has yet to be disproven. Therefore it is possible for free will to exist in a naturalistic system;
+
* Those ascribing to [[compatibilism]] believe that our experience of free will is still compatible with naturalistic causes even if the mechanism that causes this to be is not yet known. Since this can not be disproven, it is possible for free will to exist in a naturalistic system.
−
* Those ascribing to [[determinism]] believe that free will does not exist; Their point of view has yet to be disproven. Therefore it is possible that we do not have free will;
+
* Those ascribing to [[determinism]] simply believe that free will does not exist and no one has free will. Therefore there is no importance to the concept of God.