Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
20 bytes added ,  22:05, September 24, 2007
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
Sebastián Apesteguía at the Argentine Museum of Natural History and his team found the snake fossil in a terrestrial deposit in the Río Negro province of north Patagonia, Argentina, in 2003. Unlike a handful of legged fossils found in marine deposits and identified as snakes over the past decade, the new fossil, named Najash rionegrina, has a well-defined sacrum supporting a pelvis and functional hind legs outside of its ribcage.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9020.html</ref>}}
 
Sebastián Apesteguía at the Argentine Museum of Natural History and his team found the snake fossil in a terrestrial deposit in the Río Negro province of north Patagonia, Argentina, in 2003. Unlike a handful of legged fossils found in marine deposits and identified as snakes over the past decade, the new fossil, named Najash rionegrina, has a well-defined sacrum supporting a pelvis and functional hind legs outside of its ribcage.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9020.html</ref>}}
   −
Creation Scientist disputed that the snakes with legs is evidence for the theory of evolution and the creation science organization [[Answers in Genesis]] states the following:
+
[[Cration Science|Creation scientist]] disputed that the snakes with legs is evidence for the theory of evolution and the creation science organization [[Answers in Genesis]] states the following:
 
{{cquote|Even assuming it could be established that the ancestor of snakes today had legs, creationists have no problem in principle with loss of features through natural processes. Development of leglessness is not evidence for molecules-to-man evolution, which requires addition of new genetic information. Loss of legs could be achieved through degeneration of the DNA information sequences that specify leg development....
 
{{cquote|Even assuming it could be established that the ancestor of snakes today had legs, creationists have no problem in principle with loss of features through natural processes. Development of leglessness is not evidence for molecules-to-man evolution, which requires addition of new genetic information. Loss of legs could be achieved through degeneration of the DNA information sequences that specify leg development....
  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,789

edits

Navigation menu