144
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 169:
Line 169: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 20:22, September 25, 2007
, 20:22, September 25, 2007→Yet more pro-evolution bias on Wikipedia.
:PS: The accountability I speak of is for all your actions, on-line and off-. I am accountable, too. So I recognized that [[Jesus Christ|Someone]] settled that account about two thousand years ago. Of course, part of recognizing anyone for settling your account is realizing that you ''have'' an account to settle...--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 16:03, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:PS: The accountability I speak of is for all your actions, on-line and off-. I am accountable, too. So I recognized that [[Jesus Christ|Someone]] settled that account about two thousand years ago. Of course, part of recognizing anyone for settling your account is realizing that you ''have'' an account to settle...--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 16:03, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:TerryH, Where did I say the Big Bang is a proven fact? I'm simply throwing idea's here... I don't know all the answers but maybe if we throw around enough we questions we might get an answer, together. The point of my argument was that just because we do not have a valid explanation for say, the Big Bang, doesn't mean that it isn't entirely possible. Kind of reminds me of a man called Gallileo all those years ago who said some crazy things...
By the way, I've calmed down. I had a cigarette. If you've any more questions just ask, and chill! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:22, 25 September 2007 (EDT)