541
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 5:
Line 5: − +
Talk:Montreal Protocol (view source)
Revision as of 00:18, September 26, 2007
, 00:18, September 26, 2007→Replacing a sourced claim with an unsourced one?: Argh, not a typo, just had been an odd linebreak in my browser. Rephrasing a bit so that the "y" isn't the last word of the quote
I'm sorry if I'm trampling on conservative truisms here, but could I pretty please have a source there so we can see who claims what? Or a link to an article that explains it? Right now, it looks like pure opinion, sorry.
I'm sorry if I'm trampling on conservative truisms here, but could I pretty please have a source there so we can see who claims what? Or a link to an article that explains it? Right now, it looks like pure opinion, sorry.
This isn't just about this article (and I have nothing against Ed, it just happened to be this article that made me post this), but I think I fairly often saw "Liberals claim that x, but in reality, we all know that ''truth-because-it's-not-liberal'' statements here on CP. It's just now that I notice the pattern (although I'm sure it's not a deliberate act, just conservatives forgetting to mention sources for something they learned long ago and now take for granted).
This isn't just about this article (and I have nothing against Ed, it just happened to be this article that made me post this), but I think I fairly often saw "Liberals claim that x, but in reality, we all know that y is true!" ''truth-because-it's-not-liberal'' statements here on CP. It's just now that I notice the pattern (although I'm sure it's not a deliberate act, just conservatives forgetting to mention sources for something they learned long ago and now take for granted).
Any opinions? Am I just seeing things? --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:43, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
Any opinions? Am I just seeing things? --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:43, 25 September 2007 (EDT)