Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,416
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + + +
Talk:Chinese Communist Party (view source)
Revision as of 01:05, September 26, 2007
, 01:05, September 26, 2007→Should we mention the modern drive to capitalism?: clarification
:I feel I resolved this contradiction in the rest of my comment. The world is not black and white Ed, we cannot dumb down capitalism or communism into a few concise sentances. A pioneer of the law profession once said that 'Life is an exercise in the exceptions'. Read the rest of my comment, and then reply. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 19:43, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:I feel I resolved this contradiction in the rest of my comment. The world is not black and white Ed, we cannot dumb down capitalism or communism into a few concise sentances. A pioneer of the law profession once said that 'Life is an exercise in the exceptions'. Read the rest of my comment, and then reply. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 19:43, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
::"Drive toward capitalism" is commie prop; all siocities, all, are capitalistic. By "drive toward capitalism' all you are referring to is ownership of capital assets by party bosses -- ownership by theft of assets beginning several decades ago. And this has been '' how'' all Communist parties have always functioned.
::Now, you may be referring to ''some'' people being allowed to own chattel, such as cars and other personal property; this is not a "drive toward capitalism," this would be considered a more a relaxing of some human rights abuse. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:05, 25 September 2007 (EDT)