Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 179:
Line 179: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:49, September 26, 2007
, 02:49, September 26, 2007→Yet more pro-evolution bias on Wikipedia.
By the way, I've calmed down. I had a cigarette. If you've any more questions just ask, and chill! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:22, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
By the way, I've calmed down. I had a cigarette. If you've any more questions just ask, and chill! [[User:Graham|Graham]] 16:22, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
::You ''cited'' the Big Bang as ''the'' evidence that disproved creation. That could be true ''only'' if the Big Bang were a proved fact. Since it isn't, it can't disprove creation.
::Neither does Galileo's experience invalidate creation. The full treatment of the Galileo affair is out-of-scope here. What is ''in'' scope is whether evolution, and all the things that evolution depends upon, are proved facts, or mere conjectures.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:49, 25 September 2007 (EDT)