Changes

OK then Rob, you just tell me what is the difference economically between the USA and China. I'm sure you will absolutely no differences other than pedantic little points. Having had a cousin travel through China, she has told me that it is rapidly developing in an American, Capitalism culture. Every aspect of the economy is freeing up in ways unimaginable twenty years ago. Their human rights records is a disgrace, and I am not taking away from that whatsoever. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:54, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

OK then Rob, you just tell me what is the difference economically between the USA and China. I'm sure you will absolutely no differences other than pedantic little points. Having had a cousin travel through China, she has told me that it is rapidly developing in an American, Capitalism culture. Every aspect of the economy is freeing up in ways unimaginable twenty years ago. Their human rights records is a disgrace, and I am not taking away from that whatsoever. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:54, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

:Here's your predantic little point: [[GAAP]] (Generally Accepted Accounting Principals). [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=China%2BGAAP&btnG=Search]  IOW, China uses [[Enron]] accounting.  Also, a severe lack of disclosure laws.  This is why China's conglomerate manufactures are not listed on the [[Hong Kong Stock Exchange]].  As it is now, ownership of these manufactures all tend to be in the hands of family and in-laws of the Chinese military.  And the labour force are not [[AFL-CIO]], they are [[gulag]] internees.  The argument that these slave laborers in gulags are content to toil for a bowl of slop rather than be shot so thier kidneys can be marketed for export, while interesting, is not necessarily the universal condition of the oppressed working class Communists are dedicated to protect.  It is generally understood only capital offenders are usually executed so the [[collective]] treasury of the nation can profit from organ harvesting in this evolutionary advancement in poltical, social, and medical science.

:Here's your predantic little point: [[GAAP]] (Generally Accepted Accounting Principals). [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=China%2BGAAP&btnG=Search]  IOW, China uses [[Enron]] accounting.  Also, a severe lack of disclosure laws.  This is why China's conglomerate manufactures are not listed on the [[Hong Kong Stock Exchange]].  As it is now, ownership of these manufactures all tend to be in the hands of family and in-laws of the Chinese military.  And the labour force are not [[AFL-CIO]], they are [[gulag]] internees.  The argument that these slave laborers in gulags are content to toil for a bowl of slop rather than be shot so thier kidneys can be marketed for export, while interesting, is not necessarily the universal condition of the oppressed working class Communists are dedicated to protect.  It is generally understood only capital offenders are usually executed so the [[collective]] treasury of the nation can profit from organ harvesting of this [[evolution]]ary advancement in poltical, social, and medical science.

:Take [[Chinese_Communist_Party#NORINCO|Norinco]], for example; an immensely successful Chinese capitalist export manufacturer.  It makes everything from [[cruise missile]]s, [[fuel air bomb]]s, to garden sprinklers you can purchase at [[Wal-Mart]].  Even [[Martin-Marietta]] and [[Halliburton]] do not compete in the garden sprinkler business, although such technology does have a duel-use purpose for the dispersal of chemcial and biological warfare agents.  Seems American based manufacturers are deliberately limiting thier opportunities.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)

:Take [[Chinese_Communist_Party#NORINCO|Norinco]], for example; an immensely successful Chinese capitalist export manufacturer.  It makes everything from [[cruise missile]]s, [[fuel air bomb]]s, to garden sprinklers you can purchase at [[Wal-Mart]].  Even [[Martin-Marietta]] and [[Halliburton]] do not compete in the garden sprinkler business, although such technology does have a duel-use purpose for the dispersal of chemcial and biological warfare agents.  Seems American based manufacturers are deliberately limiting thier opportunities.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)