79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 124:
Line 124: + +
→Homosexual agenda
The section recently deleted should be preserved somewhere. If I don't get a good suggestion soon, I'll just put it back here. Should it go to [[Homosexual agenda]] or what? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
The section recently deleted should be preserved somewhere. If I don't get a good suggestion soon, I'll just put it back here. Should it go to [[Homosexual agenda]] or what? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:00, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps, but its not really my call. I couldn't help but look up the entries for America, Australia and England and theres nothing like that in those articles. I'm just wondering why Scotland has deserved such unfair treatment. Yes, obviously there are homosexuals in Scotland, like everywhere else, but the paragraph I deleted was grotesquely unjust and made Scotland seem like some San Francisco gone mad (but with more rain). If the paragraph is to stay then similar entries for every nation in the western world detailing gay liberation should be submitted. Remember, Scotland is only following a lead that started in the United States.--[[User:ScotsPatriot|ScotsPatriot]] 15:36, 26 September 2007 (EDT)