Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
typo
Line 3: Line 3:  
Here are some examples of canons of statutory interpretation:
 
Here are some examples of canons of statutory interpretation:
   −
*interprets a statute in a manner that avoids rendering it unconstitutional, a doctrine known as [[constitutional avoidance]]
+
*interpret a statute in a manner that avoids rendering it unconstitutional, a doctrine known as [[constitutional avoidance]]
 
*''expressio unius exclusio alterius'', "expressing one item of [an] associated group or series excludes another left unmentioned," applies when in the natural association of ideas in the mind of the reader that which is expressed is so set over by way of strong contrast to that which is omitted that the contrast enforces the affirmative inference
 
*''expressio unius exclusio alterius'', "expressing one item of [an] associated group or series excludes another left unmentioned," applies when in the natural association of ideas in the mind of the reader that which is expressed is so set over by way of strong contrast to that which is omitted that the contrast enforces the affirmative inference
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,426

edits

Navigation menu