nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + +
Talk:Climate cycles (view source)
Revision as of 17:46, September 27, 2007
, 17:46, September 27, 2007no edit summary
::I now have to figure out who to ask to have the graph uploaded...
::I now have to figure out who to ask to have the graph uploaded...
::--[[User:Scientist|Scientist]] 11:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
::--[[User:Scientist|Scientist]] 11:56, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
:You are allowed to have viewpoints for different theories as long as they are not presented as fact. So personally I don't see a problem with a graph showing 400,000 years of history as long is there is a disclaimer somewhere in the article as to what theory proposes this time structure. Also, while the number of years may be interpreted differently, the idea of a time line from earliest to modern is common across theories. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:46, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
I'm thinking the second section should probably be removed with a "See Also: Global Warming" in it's place. The idea is to only have topic conservations/arguments take place in a single area, not be readdressed in differing forms in multiple locations. Just to warn you in advance that you may not like everything put forth in the Global Warming article (it appears to be a hot button topic), but it does already exist. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:46, 27 September 2007 (EDT)