Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,900
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + +
Talk:Heterophobia (view source)
Revision as of 20:43, September 27, 2007
, 20:43, September 27, 2007→Tit for tat: cite
I'll tell you what, Ed...I'll agree to that. '''Homophobia''' is an ugly smear word that should never have been invented. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:50, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
I'll tell you what, Ed...I'll agree to that. '''Homophobia''' is an ugly smear word that should never have been invented. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:50, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
:According to the [[BBC]], "Plans to give legal status to gay and lesbian couples discriminate against heterosexual couples. ...gay and lesbian couples will be awarded the same pension and property rights as married couples. ...The moves will give next-of-kin rights in hospitals, allow gays to benefit from a dead partner's pension and exempt them from inheritance tax on a partner's home. ...'It is divisive, [[heterophobic]] and discriminatory...'" [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3030328.stm]
:There, per the "Attribution" policy authored by the anonymous avatar who goes by the handle, "SlimVirgin" in WP, we have a mainstream, reliable, source using a term which can nolonger be ascribed as a neologism. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:43, 27 September 2007 (EDT)